DOLAR 18,8383
EURO 20,3282
ALTIN 1128,59
BIST 4997,63
Adana Adıyaman Afyon Ağrı Aksaray Amasya Ankara Antalya Ardahan Artvin Aydın Balıkesir Bartın Batman Bayburt Bilecik Bingöl Bitlis Bolu Burdur Bursa Çanakkale Çankırı Çorum Denizli Diyarbakır Düzce Edirne Elazığ Erzincan Erzurum Eskişehir Gaziantep Giresun Gümüşhane Hakkari Hatay Iğdır Isparta İstanbul İzmir K.Maraş Karabük Karaman Kars Kastamonu Kayseri Kırıkkale Kırklareli Kırşehir Kilis Kocaeli Konya Kütahya Malatya Manisa Mardin Mersin Muğla Muş Nevşehir Niğde Ordu Osmaniye Rize Sakarya Samsun Siirt Sinop Sivas Şanlıurfa Şırnak Tekirdağ Tokat Trabzon Tunceli Uşak Van Yalova Yozgat Zonguldak
Gaziantep °C

The main standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

13.12.2022
0
A+
A-

The main standardized beta coefficient (? = –0

The Engagement Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Engagement subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .08). 245) for the rationalist epistemology, t(1096) = – 8.42, p < .001, was in the opposite direction compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.119) for the constructivist epistemology, t(1096) = 4.08, p < .001, along the Engagement subscale.

The Attentional Subscale Epistemology was also significant predictor of the therapy style along the Attentional subscale, F(2, 1096) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .18). The significant standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.396) for the rationalist epistemology t(1096) = , p < .001, was in the positive direction; whereas the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.129) for the constructivist epistemology t(1096) = –4.12, p < .001, which was in the negative direction along the Attentional subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology has more of a leaning towards a narrow focus on the Attentional subscale, and the constructivist epistemology leans more towards a broad focus on the Attentional subscale.

The Operative Subscale Lastly, epistemology was a significant predictor of the therapy style along the Operative subscale, F(2, 1093) = , p < .001 (R 2 = .256). The standardized beta coefficient (? = 0.461) for the rationalist epistemology was significant, t(1093) = , p < .0001 and in the positive direction, compared to the significant standardized beta coefficient (? = –0.170), for the constructivist epistemology, t(1093) = –6.50, p < .0001, which was in the negative direction along the Operative subscale. This supported the hypothesis that the rationalist epistemology tends towards more planning on the Operative subscale and the constructivist epistemology tends towards more spontaneity on the Operative subscale.

It supported the brand new theory that the rationalist epistemology looks toward a good cheaper degree of engagement with the Wedding subscale therefore the constructivist epistemology tends on a heightened amount of involvement for the Wedding subscale

Hence, epistemology (rationalist vs. constructivist) is actually discovered to be a life threatening predictor out-of cures concept. Particularly, by far the most sturdy conclusions promote provisional assistance on the belief one to there are particular differences in the non-public particular the latest specialist with respect to the therapists’ epistemic presumptions. Even more especially, the modern data learned that practitioners which have rationalist epistemologies tended into the even more distance, a lower standard of engagement, a great narrower focus, and a heightened level of believed inside their instruction having subscribers, while, the fresh new constructivist epistemology tended toward with a heightened amount of intimacy, a heightened standard of engagement, a greater desire, and much more love of life in their cures training. In addition, discover specific help for the understanding one to practitioners with constructivist epistemologies tend towards the fresh new direction regarding autonomy unlike rigidity inside their cures style; not this was not an exceptionally solid shopping for in today’s data.

Such findings are useful regarding the probably inherent variations handled from the rationalist versus constructivist epistemologies considering cures concept. A lot more especially, current conclusions hold the insight that intellectual-behavioral treatments, sitio de citas coreano para americano and that portray an educated portrayal of one’s rationalist epistemology, care for an “active-directive” and medical way of therapy (Granvold, 1988) having specific wants accustomed plan the course of course (Mahoney Lyddon, 1988).

Theory 2-Epistemology Impacts the fresh Therapeutic Matchmaking

With respect to the next hypothesis-practitioners that have rationalist epistemologies tend to rating large with the Activity and Mission subscales minimizing for the Thread subscale versus constructivist epistemologies-several other multiple linear regression model try used to determine in the event the same predictor changeable (counselor epistemology) would influence therapists’ feedback of your requirement details (functioning alliance) centered on therapists’ millions of three subscales-Activity, Objective, and you can Bond.

YORUMLAR

Henüz yorum yapılmamış. İlk yorumu yukarıdaki form aracılığıyla siz yapabilirsiniz.